Started By
Message
re: Why all the SEC hatred for Missouri and A&M?
Posted on 8/9/12 at 1:12 am to BluegrassBelle
Posted on 8/9/12 at 1:12 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
BluegrassBelle
Belle, you bit hard on that half-troll by Killz.
As a state overall, Kentucky is more southern than Missouri. However, the bootheel of Missouri is definitely more southern than just about any part of Kentucky, mainly due to it being a part of the Mississippi delta and being made up of mostly swamps/marshlands and being a heavy cotton growing area as well. Most of mid-south Missouri is similar to Kentucky IMO, and the northern half of Missouri is Midwestern. My sig pic breaks it down pretty well.
quote:
Kentucky Southern Belles > Meth Mouthed Hookers from St. Louis.
I dont know of anyone who would disagree with that
those KC hookers on the other hand.... 
1
Posted on 8/9/12 at 1:38 am to KCM0Tiger
BluegrassBelle,
So what you essentially admitted is that you know nothing of Missouri history. We too had two different governments, was a split state, had the second most battles of any state during the civil war, and a star on the confederate flag.
Considering Missouri's 100 percent southern roots dating back to before the war, do you actually believe that Missouri has lost all it's southern heritage?
But then again, kentucky's secessionist government was also represented on the stars and bars. And, KCMO's Missouri map is very accurate.
Therefore, it would seem like Missouri and Kentucky are almost exactly alike. We were both recognized by the confederacy on the flag, we were split border states, we grow the same crops (including cotton and tobacco), we have a bunch of white trash in our states, and we're both in the SEC.
Which means it's damn time the conference let us in! To not do so would be to turn your back on a fellow southern state. Judging from some of the "southern" posters on here, I wouldn't be surprised by that type of douchebaggery from the south.
Yes, Missouri and Kenfricky are very much alike, with one exception....
Missouri's a far better state...and football program. Kentucky sucks balls. I'll give you basketball, but your time at the top is over now that we're here.
So what you essentially admitted is that you know nothing of Missouri history. We too had two different governments, was a split state, had the second most battles of any state during the civil war, and a star on the confederate flag.
Considering Missouri's 100 percent southern roots dating back to before the war, do you actually believe that Missouri has lost all it's southern heritage?
But then again, kentucky's secessionist government was also represented on the stars and bars. And, KCMO's Missouri map is very accurate.
Therefore, it would seem like Missouri and Kentucky are almost exactly alike. We were both recognized by the confederacy on the flag, we were split border states, we grow the same crops (including cotton and tobacco), we have a bunch of white trash in our states, and we're both in the SEC.
Which means it's damn time the conference let us in! To not do so would be to turn your back on a fellow southern state. Judging from some of the "southern" posters on here, I wouldn't be surprised by that type of douchebaggery from the south.
Yes, Missouri and Kenfricky are very much alike, with one exception....
Missouri's a far better state...and football program. Kentucky sucks balls. I'll give you basketball, but your time at the top is over now that we're here.
This post was edited on 8/9/12 at 1:47 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News