Started By
Message

re: Civil War nicknames for SEC states..

Posted on 6/27/12 at 7:27 pm to
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
12763 posts
Posted on 6/27/12 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

The war for the Confederacy, IMO, was certainly lost in the west. Fort Donelson was a critical blow to the cause.
I don't really know how anyone could argue that.

If Tennesee had stayed under Confederate control (either from the beginning or with a pushback after Shiloh) Kentucky would have been much more in play, and if Kentucky falls, you have the chance to play havoc with boat traffic along the Ohio.

If Vicksburg/Memphis/NOLA never fall, the Confederacy still has use of the Mississipi as a supply route.

If Chattanooga never falls, Atlanta is never touched, and that was the biggest lynchpin in the endgame was losing Atlanta and then Savannah.

Finally, if the western theater had turned out differently, Grant would never have become a hot item, would never have been given The Army of the Potomac, and Lee might well have forced a stalemate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter