Started By
Message

re: CFN: The SEC's 6-1-1 Disaster

Posted on 6/6/12 at 12:28 am to
Posted by Bellabama
Omnipotent, Omniscient, Omnipresent
Member since Nov 2009
30878 posts
Posted on 6/6/12 at 12:28 am to
quote:

Why does it have to be those two teams? It could just as easily be UGA and UF on our schedule on a given year. Why do you choose bad teams when the odds of good teams are just as possible? Oh that's right, because it hurts your argument and showcases the stupidity of this entire thing.


It doesn't hurt my argument. I think your argument is obtuse, biased, and uninformed. I was just pointing out that there are different definitions of fair. It's ridiculous to call my argument stupid when 11 of the 14 teams who could vote agree with my line of thinking. I think you are weak for dismissing my argument as stupid.
Posted by Tiger Authority
Member since Jul 2007
29476 posts
Posted on 6/6/12 at 12:34 am to
quote:

It's ridiculous to call my argument stupid when 11 of the 14 teams who could vote agree with my line of thinking.


They aren't voting on fairness. They're voting on self-interest. What incentive does OM have to change the current structure? ZERO. So your notion that this points to them voting on fairness is completely untrue. They're not.

I've answered your questions and you want to quibble over some existential idea of the true meaning of the word "fair."

Again, LSU could just as easily draw UF and UGA under a 6-2 format. But so could anyone in the West. Just as anyone could draw shite teams too. But not under the current format. Nope. Under the current format, some teams will always have it easier while others will always have it tougher.

Same conference. Same title. Same money. Built-in schedules where some teams have it easier and others tougher.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 6/6/12 at 12:35 am to
quote:

I think your argument is obtuse, biased, and uninformed.


quote:

Alabama Fan




quote:

It's ridiculous to call my argument stupid when 11 of the 14 teams who could vote agree with my line of thinking.


As we've discussed before:

- Why in the hell would Vandy, Ole Miss, MSU, and UK vote against this? There's 8 of the 14 right there already "in favor" of it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter