Started By
Message

re: 4 not enough?

Posted on 5/17/12 at 6:57 am to
Posted by mrbroker
Sylacauga Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
16575 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 6:57 am to
this conference champions thing is a pile of crock. The goal is to find the best team and you could easily have a conference winner with 3 losses but an sec team with one loss not make it based on things I am reading on this thread. I want to see the best teams face off, however many we start with.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23136 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 7:00 am to
What if the SEC champ has 3 losses? they get in too

I mean everyone in the SEC rant keeps explaining how it "screws" the SEC. It doesn't. It takes all the subjectivity out of it, and gives a brightline way of getting in.

The first Bama/LSU game is played differently if this is in place
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 7:10 am to
dachsie:
quote:

I would say no AQ and the top 8 or 12 ranked teams play in a playoff system

IMO, if you're going to have a playoff, get rid of relying on the polls. If you use conference champions you get two things, conference races that are still meaningful, and getting rid of opinion polls.

mrbroker:
quote:

this conference champions thing is a pile of crock. The goal is to find the best team and you could easily have a conference winner with 3 losses but an sec team with one loss not make it based on things I am reading on this thread. I want to see the best teams face off, however many we start with.

First of all any Alabama fan saying that the conference champion is a crock of shite should be ashamed of themselves.

But if you're going to rely on polls, why have a playoff at all?

Alabama sitting there with twice as many SEC championships than the team with the next most...?

Last year was a fluke, 9 times out of 10, Alabama is going to be the one with the SEC title. The argument of 'next best conference team' smacks of Auburnism.

You want to go to the playoffs? Win your conference. The advantage for the SEC team there is that they will be bettter prepared for the playoffs after having played a tougher schedule.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84887 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 7:11 am to
quote:

this conference champions thing is a pile of crock. The goal is to find the best team and you could easily have a conference winner with 3 losses but an sec team with one loss not make it based on things I am reading on this thread. I want to see the best teams face off, however many we start with.


in principle having only conference champions is the right thing to do. How can you claim to be the best team in the nation if you can't prove you're the best team in your section of the nation?

That said, I don't want to see that rule implemented because one day we can't back into the playoffs when we have no business being there and knock out Alabama.
Posted by tiger chaser
Birmingham Ala
Member since Feb 2008
7624 posts
Posted on 5/17/12 at 8:41 am to
this conference champions thing is a pile of crock. The goal is to find the best team and you could easily have a conference winner with 3 losses but an sec team with one loss not make it based on things I am reading on this thread. I want to see the best teams face off, however many we start with

Figures, winnin conference no longer means anything..used to a home loss was worse than losing on the road...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter