Started By
Message
re: Could SEC dominance eventually hurt college football?
Posted on 4/29/12 at 11:00 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Posted on 4/29/12 at 11:00 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Orgeron needs to be watched with a Hubble powered microscope.
That's my boy we need him in Happy Valley
0
Posted on 4/29/12 at 11:31 pm to KillianRussell
quote:
Ain't spinning shite just disputing your loaded stats.
My statement can not be disputed. Big10 has two titles since '69.
Posted on 4/30/12 at 12:15 am to AllBamaDoesIsWin
quote:
What if they make a playoff and the SEC still wins every year (highly likely), will people outside the southeast ever give up on watching college football because they have no chance?
quote:
It'll build anticipation to see who could eventually dethrone the SEC.
Just like how the NFC won like 15 straight Super Bowls. Someone will eventually beat an SEC team for a NC
Posted on 4/30/12 at 12:22 am to bona fide
Gump math!
Your 44 years in question if we are talking about the Big Ten and it's future you can't discount the entire membership, please note the current members of the big ten have won the title 9 times in the period in question feel free to include your recent additions national titles for a fair comparison
Your 44 years in question if we are talking about the Big Ten and it's future you can't discount the entire membership, please note the current members of the big ten have won the title 9 times in the period in question feel free to include your recent additions national titles for a fair comparison
This post was edited on 4/30/12 at 12:30 am
Posted on 4/30/12 at 12:30 am to KillianRussell
Every time I call up Stassen this pops up. Hired a computer kid to keep it on autofreeze.
Posted on 4/30/12 at 12:33 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Confused ? Are you asking how, set the period parameters, if so hit the blue arrow to change the data input
ETA in the last 44 years Nebraska was the best college football program with the best winning percentage and titles in 1970, 1971, 1994, 1995, and 1997
ETA in the last 44 years Nebraska was the best college football program with the best winning percentage and titles in 1970, 1971, 1994, 1995, and 1997
This post was edited on 4/30/12 at 12:36 am
Posted on 4/30/12 at 12:40 am to KillianRussell
quote:
ETA in the last 44 years
That's the whole point of autofreeze. Prior post of mine was poor attempt at humor, apologies, carry on.
Posted on 4/30/12 at 12:46 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
No harm no foul, punching holes in the shitty math and bogus claims a hobby as I recovery from an illness 
Posted on 4/30/12 at 12:50 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
44 years is the wrong period to claim Bama dominance even if they win 3 titles in 4 years as Big Red did the Tide winning percentage in that time span will not eclipse Nebraska provided the Cornhuskers do not go 0-12
This post was edited on 4/30/12 at 12:51 am
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:17 am to KillianRussell
The Tide had excellent coaches before Bryant (Thomas and Wade come to mind) and after but his run from 61 - 81 (13 conference championships and 6 #1 awards) is the definition of a dynasty. This 'dynasty' talk of late is for the cheerio crowd, imo.
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:21 am to Tiger1242
quote:
What if they make a playoff and the SEC still wins every year (highly likely), will people outside the southeast ever give up on watching college football because they have no chance?
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:34 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
There is a current confrence dynasty but I doubt we will see another run like Bryant's where one squad lapped the feild both nationally and regionally
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:38 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Mizzou, listening to Pinkel, I'm not so sure.
LINK
"Ramirez said Missouri has a great coaching staff and he has a lot of friends on the team. But as much as he loves the school, he’s not sure he would have committed if it weren’t for the move to the nation’s most prestigious football conference."
“'The main thing the coaching staff said to me is that the true big dogs go to the SEC,' Clay said. 'I like that a lot.'"
Seems like many posters aren't bothering to learn anything about Mizzou or look at what the staff's been saying before posting their assumptions.
Compare Mizzou's ad campaign with several billboards in the Southeast, the "rise to the level of competition" commercial that's been playing, including during the SEC basketball tournament, and rebranding for the SEC move with this billboard A&M plans to put up:
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:39 am to KillianRussell
quote:
Your 44 years in question if we are talking about the Big Ten and it's future you can't discount the entire membership,
I never stated anything about the future of the Big10 or the new programs. I quoted and replied to this post
quote:
conferences like the Big Ten who have traditionally been very good in football but have flat out mailed it in.
Was merely pointing out that the BIG10 has only won two titles in over forty years, therefore casting doubt on the belief that the BIG10 is a strong conference traditionally.
Hopefully this clears up your spin problem, if you are in need of further clarification I will be more than happy to assist.
Posted on 4/30/12 at 5:00 am to molsusports
quote:I don't think they are equal though. I give Florida the edge over Texas as far as producing the best CF recruits, but Texas isn't far behind. USC just pulled two Rivals 4 Star recruits from the Sunshine State. Any good CF program can prepare a top notch CF athlete for the NFL, but USC is in that media fishbowl. It's almost like having your own marketing company. Play well at USC and you will be all over ESPN, and they know it. Being in Los Angeles also offers one or two extracurricular activities not present in Gainesville (although Austin does have a few charms of its own.)
all things being equal it will probably still be at least as easy to succeed at Florida and Texas as it is at USC
Posted on 4/30/12 at 9:09 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
Being in Los Angeles also offers one or two extracurricular activities not present in Gainesville
Well, yeah, if you are in to that sort of thing, but kids these days are more concerned with academics and finishing school rather than extracurricular activities.
Posted on 4/30/12 at 9:44 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
but USC is in that media fishbowl. It's almost like having your own marketing company. Play well at USC and you will be all over ESPN,
as opposed to the relationship between Texas and ESPN?
Posted on 4/30/12 at 10:44 am to NaturalLight00
quote:
Compare Mizzou's ad campaign with several billboards in the Southeast, the "rise to the level of competition" commercial that's been playing, including during the SEC basketball tournament, and rebranding for the SEC move with this billboard A&M plans to put up:
Our VP of marketing said we are waiting until we join the SEC officially July 1st or maybe a little before to launch our advertising campaign because we still have teams like baseball competing for BigXII championships and to start building hype closer to the start of the season instead of months before.
For now, we have that one billboard near college station that replaced an ad regarding our national title in women's basketball so that we could keep the billboard. Have no fear Mizzou fans, the A&M marketing machine will be in full force soon enough.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News