Started By
Message

re: Which would you prefer?

Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:47 am to
Posted by 1991UW
Seattle, WA
Member since Feb 2012
303 posts
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:47 am to
quote:

UW is just terrible.

Not as terrible as Auburn before they started paying $200,000 for recruits.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105449 posts
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Not as terrible as Auburn before they started paying $200,000 for recruits


lulz....Is that all you got? By the way I was talking more about you, but since you brought your team up, it kind of makes sense really. You're correct, you both suck arse.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38021 posts
Posted on 2/27/12 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Not as terrible as Auburn before they started paying $200,000 for recruits.


So, so much mad and stupid jam-packed into 300 posts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter