Started By
Message

re: Which would you prefer?

Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:38 am to
Posted by ThaKaptin
The Sultan of Swag
Member since Nov 2010
21741 posts
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Yep, because Locker has sucked in the NFL with his 99.4 QB Rating.


I dont believe I said anything negative at all about Jake Locker in my post. Why so defensive?

FWIW, I thought he was, and is, a really good QB. And I am counting on your former offensive coordinator, currently OUR new offensive coordinator, to develop QB's in Tuscaloosa like he did Jake up there.
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
17996 posts
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:42 am to
Well, given our recent history with running QB's...Give me the prototype...all day everyday.
Posted by 1991UW
Seattle, WA
Member since Feb 2012
303 posts
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:46 am to
quote:


FWIW, I thought he was, and is, a really good QB. And I am counting on your former offensive coordinator, currently OUR new offensive coordinator, to develop QB's in Tuscaloosa like he did Jake up there.


He was good but most of the credit still goes to Sark... who actually calls the plays.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter