Started By
Message
Which would you prefer?
Posted on 2/27/12 at 6:28 am
Posted on 2/27/12 at 6:28 am
A playmaker athlete at qb? (Vick, RG3) or prototypical qb? (Luck, Wilson, Murray)
7
Posted on 2/27/12 at 6:31 am to bigeztiger
Prototypical QB, although hopefully with some running ability (like a 4.7 or 4.8) to take some easy yards if they're given and to escape the pass rushers. It was painful watching Mallett try to scramble with his cement clown shoes.
This post was edited on 2/27/12 at 6:32 am
Posted on 2/27/12 at 6:43 am to bigeztiger
quote:
A playmaker athlete at qb? (Vick, RG3) or prototypical qb? (Luck, Wilson, Murray)
LOL @ putting RGIII in the same class as Vick and Murray and Wilson in the same class as Luck.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:27 am to bigeztiger
quote:
A playmaker athlete at qb? (Vick, RG3) or prototypical qb? (Luck, Wilson, Murray)
Some of y'all are so obvious.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:34 am to bigeztiger
Vick and RG3 are different. Rg3 is just as much of a pocket passer as most qbs. He can just run too. And luck is Petyton manning running a 4.6. Shiiiiiiiiiiiiit. In the pros, I would want Luck.
This post was edited on 2/27/12 at 8:36 am
Posted on 2/27/12 at 8:47 am to bigeztiger
Pro-style offense with a drop back passer.
Posted on 2/27/12 at 9:02 am to bigeztiger
Murray is more of a balanced QB than our typical, run of the mill prototypical QB we usually have.
And I'd prefer the normal QB to a Vick or so but I'd take RG III over Murray any day
And I'd prefer the normal QB to a Vick or so but I'd take RG III over Murray any day
Posted on 2/27/12 at 12:08 pm to bigeztiger
Either would be OK, but I sure did enjoy watching Matt Jones do his magic when he was playing.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News