Started By
Message
re: Bama's Elite 18
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:58 pm to gatordmb89
Posted on 1/21/12 at 12:58 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
It appears that it has affect AU more than Bama. Mainly because Bama has a stronger brand, and recruits well OOS, and owns a good portion of GA thanks to Kirby Smart. Also, look at how Bama went into LA and took its best prospect. I don't think it affects Bama much, but it obviously affects AU.
disagree.... especially within the state of AL... outside of Louis (who's a south FL guy to begin with) FSU, who have we lost out on?... Cashier and Winston would be T-town bound if not for FSU.
Now, come Feb 1st and we lose out on Williams, Goldman, Darby, i'll change my tune.
1
Posted on 1/21/12 at 1:04 pm to lowspark12
I think the argument applies even less to Auburn. AU has always signed guys from all over the southeast. The state of Alabama leans about 70-75% pro-UA. The football talent in any given year generally follows that statistic. Auburn didn't build its football fortunes of Alabama talent alone. AU has always been at its best when they're recruiting Georgia and Florida at a high rate.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News