Started By
Message
re: WVa & TCU > A&M & Mizzou
Posted on 1/5/12 at 11:27 am to AGBQ99
Posted on 1/5/12 at 11:27 am to AGBQ99
quote:
but the Big 12 is still going to be one of the Big 4 conferences when all is said and done.
Actually, they won't. The writing is already on the wall that the conferences who will be left behind are the ones without a CCG.
Four conferences got 2 teams each into the BCS:
ACC, SEC, B1G, PAC 12. All had CCGs.
Posted on 1/5/12 at 11:52 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Lots of interesting (and predictable) responses, however, the OP said nothing about AAU, Academics, Fan Base, Brands, Potential, or any of that other crap. What I am talking about is performance on the field. And I don't care about 20 years ago, but am looking at recent history (since 2000).
TCU: BCS Bowls - 2 (1-1)
Wva: BCS Bowls - 3 (3-0)
Mizzou: BCS Bowls - 0
A&M: BCS Bowls - 0
In terms of performance on the field, the evidence is clear that adding TCU & West Virginia to the Big 12 has made it a stronger football conference. I'll even go 1 step further - Either TCU or WVa is better than either A&M & Mizzou in football. The Big 12 just became a better football conference.
Now you can argue all you want about potential and all that other stuff. Potential just means that you haven't done it yet.
TCU: BCS Bowls - 2 (1-1)
Wva: BCS Bowls - 3 (3-0)
Mizzou: BCS Bowls - 0
A&M: BCS Bowls - 0
In terms of performance on the field, the evidence is clear that adding TCU & West Virginia to the Big 12 has made it a stronger football conference. I'll even go 1 step further - Either TCU or WVa is better than either A&M & Mizzou in football. The Big 12 just became a better football conference.
Now you can argue all you want about potential and all that other stuff. Potential just means that you haven't done it yet.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News