Started By
Message

re: WVa & TCU > A&M & Mizzou

Posted on 1/5/12 at 11:27 am to
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80478 posts
Posted on 1/5/12 at 11:27 am to
quote:

but the Big 12 is still going to be one of the Big 4 conferences when all is said and done.


Actually, they won't. The writing is already on the wall that the conferences who will be left behind are the ones without a CCG.

Four conferences got 2 teams each into the BCS:

ACC, SEC, B1G, PAC 12. All had CCGs.
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 1/5/12 at 11:52 am to
Lots of interesting (and predictable) responses, however, the OP said nothing about AAU, Academics, Fan Base, Brands, Potential, or any of that other crap. What I am talking about is performance on the field. And I don't care about 20 years ago, but am looking at recent history (since 2000).

TCU: BCS Bowls - 2 (1-1)
Wva: BCS Bowls - 3 (3-0)
Mizzou: BCS Bowls - 0
A&M: BCS Bowls - 0

In terms of performance on the field, the evidence is clear that adding TCU & West Virginia to the Big 12 has made it a stronger football conference. I'll even go 1 step further - Either TCU or WVa is better than either A&M & Mizzou in football. The Big 12 just became a better football conference.

Now you can argue all you want about potential and all that other stuff. Potential just means that you haven't done it yet.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter