Started By
Message

re: Alabama didn't want Auburn to go to the east so they could play them in BCSCG.

Posted on 12/8/11 at 2:38 pm to
Posted by winyahpercy
Georgetown, South Carolina
Member since Nov 2010
1383 posts
Posted on 12/8/11 at 2:38 pm to
Auburn will be in the East within a couple years.
Missouri in the East won't allow Missouri to develop their program because they won't get any recruiting efficiencies to their region. It will also tax the other SEC-E schools that will have to travel across the country every other year.
Once they figure out how to handle the Bama-Tennessee game, Auburn will move to the East.
Posted by Luke
1113 Chartres Street, NOLA
Member since Nov 2004
13419 posts
Posted on 12/8/11 at 2:45 pm to
the easiest solution for moving AU to the east... let bama play UT yearly and AU rotate on the schedule... they claim UT as their rival so let'em have it...
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/8/11 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

winyahpercy

Why not just switch Florida and Arkansas? Call the East the North and call the West the South. Everything would make sense geographically and you wouldn't have to put the SEC's biggest rivalry in two different divisions.

Or did I just blow your mind?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter