Started By
Message
re: Do all of the Non Qualifiers know that the party is over
Posted on 12/6/11 at 9:25 am to crawdaddy52
Posted on 12/6/11 at 9:25 am to crawdaddy52
Do the Rose, Sugar, Fiesta, and Orange relinquish their rights to their respective conference champions?
Somewhat unrelated note, I think the BCS has done a pretty good job (for the most part) at matching 1-2 in title games. However, in doing so they have pretty much ruined many bowl games and bowl seasons. It seemed like their were more intriguing bowl match ups produced annually when the bowls were not forced to take teams. Its been a while since there's been a season where every team in the big 4 bowls were really the most deserving. Hell, I would say that USCe and Arkansas deserve to be in one of the big 4 before WVU, UM, and Va Tech.
Somewhat unrelated note, I think the BCS has done a pretty good job (for the most part) at matching 1-2 in title games. However, in doing so they have pretty much ruined many bowl games and bowl seasons. It seemed like their were more intriguing bowl match ups produced annually when the bowls were not forced to take teams. Its been a while since there's been a season where every team in the big 4 bowls were really the most deserving. Hell, I would say that USCe and Arkansas deserve to be in one of the big 4 before WVU, UM, and Va Tech.
Posted on 12/6/11 at 9:32 am to Tha Truth
as i understand, bowls would still make deals w/ conferences for preferences that don't disrupt the BCS championship. i'm sure the Sugar still wants the SEC teams and the Rose - B10 and P12. However, the Orange is getting tired of being dealt the crap from the ACC and Big East.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News