quote:
I agree with you but in this case, if you're an objective voter, you would probably be considering BOTH and whereas too many Oklahoma's State case are trying to bracket off both dominance of the wins as if that isn't something to consider at all.

This is exactly like claiming Alabama proponents want to only focus on losses. It's purposefully selecting certain elements of the resume while effacing others to make an argument.

It's understandable but it's certainly not objectively looking at "total body of work".

I am looking at both. And the advantage of Okie st beating more BCS top 25 teams, more teams with winning records, and winning their conference championship is more than enough to overcome the differences in how dominant each team was.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by ReauxlTide222

St. Petersburg

Member since Nov 2010

83591 posts

Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:08 pm to OneMoreTime

If that is your opinion then I'd have to respect it. We just disagree I guess. Nothing wrong with that.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by lsurebel4

New Orleans

Member since Dec 2006

45 posts

Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:11 pm to OneMoreTime

Bottom Line.

Alabama has only beaten 3 teams with a winning record. Their only competition was LSU and they got spanked at home. OSU deserved their shot. They beat more teams with a +.500 record, more top 25, AND won their conference. BAMA had their shot, and blew it. They DID NOT deserve a rematch. TOTAL BCS! LSU will beat that arse this go round!