Started By
Message
re: Doesn't it speak volumes that Alabama being voted
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:04 pm to OneMoreTime
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:04 pm to OneMoreTime
quote:
It is something you consider. But I'd say that the caliber of teams you've beaten is more important than how badly you beat them.
I agree with you, but in this case, if you're an objective voter, you would probably be considering BOTH whereas too many making Oklahoma State's case are trying to bracket off dominance of the wins as if that isn't something to consider at all.
This is exactly like claiming Alabama proponents want to only focus on losses. It's purposefully selecting certain elements of the resume while effacing others to make an argument.
It's understandable but it's certainly not objectively looking at "total body of work".
This post was edited on 12/5/11 at 3:13 pm
1
Posted on 12/5/11 at 3:07 pm to wm72
quote:I am looking at both. And the advantage of Okie st beating more BCS top 25 teams, more teams with winning records, and winning their conference championship is more than enough to overcome the differences in how dominant each team was.
I agree with you but in this case, if you're an objective voter, you would probably be considering BOTH and whereas too many Oklahoma's State case are trying to bracket off both dominance of the wins as if that isn't something to consider at all.
This is exactly like claiming Alabama proponents want to only focus on losses. It's purposefully selecting certain elements of the resume while effacing others to make an argument.
It's understandable but it's certainly not objectively looking at "total body of work".
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News