Started By
Message

re: Why anti SEC people want a rematch and SEC purists shouldn't

Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:09 pm to
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
25088 posts
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Dude, Stanford lost at home.
Also,
03 LSU lost at home to Florida, won the NC
07 LSU lost at home to Arky, won the NC.
08 Florida lost at home to Ole Miss, won the NC.




We aren't. LSU did not play against UF in the 03 title game. LSU did not play against Arky in the 07 title game. UF did not play against Ole Miss in the 08 title game.


It's apples and oranges, dude. No one is saying Bama doesn't have a case, or wouldn't be worthy. All LSU fans are saying (much to the chagrin of Bama fans) is that Bama had a crack in November and lost. If a decision had to be made today, then yes, Bama should get the nod. However, if OSU wins next weekend, a very, very strong case can be made for them over Bama. One reason being they have not already lost to LSU.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

We aren't. LSU did not play against UF in the 03 title game. LSU did not play against Arky in the 07 title game. UF did not play against Ole Miss in the 08 title game.

But you base who's deserving on their resume, not based on who they might play against. In 03, 07, 08 it didn't matter who they played against in the BCSNC, they deserved to go. Who they're gonna play is irrelevant.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter