Started By
Message
re: #1 LSU vs #3 Ark .. (LSU by 12 ½.) ......
Posted on 11/23/11 at 12:49 pm to woopiginaustin
Posted on 11/23/11 at 12:49 pm to woopiginaustin
I said parlays are sucker bets. If you want to give money away, good for you. But using your incredibly stupid, uninformed logic I asked how parlaying the ML dogs generally works out? Do you think "going [I] against[/I]" Vegas usually works out as often as your other scenario?
No game is a sure thing, everyone knows that. But your logic of being "with" Vegas is just stupid.You can be with or against the betting public, but Vegas doesn't give a shite if you are with or against them.
No game is a sure thing, everyone knows that. But your logic of being "with" Vegas is just stupid.You can be with or against the betting public, but Vegas doesn't give a shite if you are with or against them.
1
Posted on 11/23/11 at 12:54 pm to MOT
I should have worded 'with Vegas' different.
I don't have the energy to debate it though. My stance is that if you were to simply throw all the 14+ pt home favorites in a moneyline parlay, you would lose more than you win. Whole point being, 2 TD favorites lose all the time. All-The-Time.
That doesn't mean that Vegas is stupid, that LSU will lose to Arkansas or that I'm some sort of authority of gambling.
I don't have the energy to debate it though. My stance is that if you were to simply throw all the 14+ pt home favorites in a moneyline parlay, you would lose more than you win. Whole point being, 2 TD favorites lose all the time. All-The-Time.
That doesn't mean that Vegas is stupid, that LSU will lose to Arkansas or that I'm some sort of authority of gambling.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News