Started By
Message
re: Is Oregon's arguement better than Bama's?
Posted on 11/9/11 at 9:10 am to Govt Tide
Posted on 11/9/11 at 9:10 am to Govt Tide
I would say Oregon has a better argument for a rematch that Bama for these reasons.
Oregon lost to us week 1 and has had time to improve, while Bama lost late in the year
Oregon would have won its conference while Bama would not have won its own division
Oregon lost on a neutral field that really wasn't neutral at all, while Bama could not win AT HOME!!!
To me, the fact that bama lost at home outweighs anything else.
Oregon lost to us week 1 and has had time to improve, while Bama lost late in the year
Oregon would have won its conference while Bama would not have won its own division
Oregon lost on a neutral field that really wasn't neutral at all, while Bama could not win AT HOME!!!
To me, the fact that bama lost at home outweighs anything else.
1
Posted on 11/9/11 at 10:18 am to memphis tiger
LOL @ the arguments for Oregon cause they played Lsu on a neutral site but no mentions of Oregon getting to face Lsu who was playing without JJ and Russell Sheppard. Not like Lsu needed them against Bama or anything 
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News