re: Is Oregon's arguement better than Bama's?

quote:

---

Not sure if better, but probably just as good. Their only loss is to the same team, and they both pretty much dominated the rest of their schedule (assuming of course they run the table).
An oregon win over Stanford will look better than any win that Bama has, right?
The more I think about it, if Stanford and OK St both lose, then it's either Oregon or Boise who gets the nod. But who knows. It's going to be a crazy ride. Love the BCS. I don't understand why there is so much hate for the system. It is flat out fun and drama filled every week of every season. No other sport has that.

---

I realize Alabama lost a game so we can't REALLY expect to be given the benefit of the doubt in all cases but it's funny hearing LSU fans constantly inventing new reasons and scenarios about how Bama has no business being in the rematch discussion.

Oklahoma State loses then its Oklahoma automatically deserves it over Alabama. Who cares that they have a horrible home loss to a barely bowl eligible Texas Tech team.

Oregon wins out and they deserve it because their blowout loss to LSU is less of an issue than Alabama's loss in an OT squeaker.

Oklahoma State, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Stanford all lose and then LSU fans will be singing Boise State's praises arguing for them to get their chance because they're a conference champion and Bama isn't after all. :lol:

Okie State, Oklahoma, Oregon, Stanford, and Boise State all lose and LSU fans will be telling us that Houston deserves a chance over Alabama because they could probably score a few more on offense against LSU and they are, after all, conference champions. :lol:

LSU loses either to Arkansas or Georgia and they'll deserve a spot in the BCS Title game over Alabama because as we've heard all year they've played Oregon and West Virginia while Alabama hasn't played anyone. :lol: