Started By
Message
locked post

AU fans: Is Roof running Chizik's D scheme or his own D scheme?

Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:48 am
Posted by Quigley
Down Under
Member since Jul 2009
4007 posts
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:48 am
Talked to a coworker who is an AU fan and he said that Roof isn't running the system that he wants to run and is instead running Chizik's scheme. He was basically defending Roof by saying that he was having to run a D scheme that he doesn't want to run.

Is this correct? Makes sense that a HC would tell a DC to run his system, but not familiar enough with Chizik's or Roof's past D schemes to know if there is that big of a difference.
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:48 am to
they don't let me in on their coaches meetings so i don't know. whatever they're doing they need to try something else.
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:48 am to
Chizik is running Roof's scheme for him.
Posted by adammwilson
Carrollton (GA)
Member since Jul 2009
21519 posts
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:49 am to
it is correct.
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
91654 posts
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:49 am to
Roof hasn't had a defense worth a shite in 10 years.
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22031 posts
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:51 am to
I don't pretend to know, but Chizik needs to get us back to pre-2009 some way and somehow.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54192 posts
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:52 am to
The only things that seems clear is that they aren't on the same page and whatever they are doing isn't working.
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
51872 posts
Posted on 9/27/11 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Talked to a coworker who is an AU fan and he said that Roof isn't running the system that he wants to run and is instead running Chizik's scheme. He was basically defending Roof by saying that he was having to run a D scheme that he doesn't want to run.

Is this correct?


If your co-worker isn't sitting in on the practices and meetings with the coaches, he is as clueless as the rest of us and in reality doesn't know his arse from a hole in the ground...the same as those saying it's all Roof's fault. Myself included.
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
16184 posts
Posted on 9/27/11 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Talked to a coworker who is an AU fan and he said that Roof isn't running the system that he wants to run and is instead running Chizik's scheme. He was basically defending Roof by saying that he was having to run a D scheme that he doesn't want to run.

Is this correct? Makes sense that a HC would tell a DC to run his system, but not familiar enough with Chizik's or Roof's past D schemes to know if there is that big of a difference.


my thoughts on this all along has been that Roof is trying to do what Chizik wants and it is a conflict with what Roof has always done and implmemented - I think its a conflic of Defense planning and schemes - and Roof will be let go after thsi season, if not before.

it reminds me a lot of the Tubby/Franklin Debacle as well.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter