Started By
Message
AU fans: Is Roof running Chizik's D scheme or his own D scheme?
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:48 am
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:48 am
Talked to a coworker who is an AU fan and he said that Roof isn't running the system that he wants to run and is instead running Chizik's scheme. He was basically defending Roof by saying that he was having to run a D scheme that he doesn't want to run.
Is this correct? Makes sense that a HC would tell a DC to run his system, but not familiar enough with Chizik's or Roof's past D schemes to know if there is that big of a difference.
Is this correct? Makes sense that a HC would tell a DC to run his system, but not familiar enough with Chizik's or Roof's past D schemes to know if there is that big of a difference.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:48 am to Quigley
they don't let me in on their coaches meetings so i don't know. whatever they're doing they need to try something else.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:48 am to Quigley
Chizik is running Roof's scheme for him.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:49 am to Quigley
Roof hasn't had a defense worth a shite in 10 years.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:51 am to Quigley
I don't pretend to know, but Chizik needs to get us back to pre-2009 some way and somehow.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:52 am to Quigley
The only things that seems clear is that they aren't on the same page and whatever they are doing isn't working.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 11:01 am to Quigley
quote:
Talked to a coworker who is an AU fan and he said that Roof isn't running the system that he wants to run and is instead running Chizik's scheme. He was basically defending Roof by saying that he was having to run a D scheme that he doesn't want to run.
Is this correct?
If your co-worker isn't sitting in on the practices and meetings with the coaches, he is as clueless as the rest of us and in reality doesn't know his arse from a hole in the ground...the same as those saying it's all Roof's fault. Myself included.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 11:10 am to Quigley
quote:
Talked to a coworker who is an AU fan and he said that Roof isn't running the system that he wants to run and is instead running Chizik's scheme. He was basically defending Roof by saying that he was having to run a D scheme that he doesn't want to run.
Is this correct? Makes sense that a HC would tell a DC to run his system, but not familiar enough with Chizik's or Roof's past D schemes to know if there is that big of a difference.
my thoughts on this all along has been that Roof is trying to do what Chizik wants and it is a conflict with what Roof has always done and implmemented - I think its a conflic of Defense planning and schemes - and Roof will be let go after thsi season, if not before.
it reminds me a lot of the Tubby/Franklin Debacle as well.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News