Started By
Message

re: S. Carolina charged with failure to monitor; subject to repeat violator status

Posted on 9/19/11 at 4:40 pm to
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 9/19/11 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

No because these allegations (thus far) haven't seemed to give us any on field advantage. From the looks of it we had athletes already here and the decision was made to keep them in the hotel. Not a "if you come here we'll let you stay in a hotel for $14 a night"


"From the fall 2009 semester through Feb 2011, Lahn had impermissible recruiting contacts with and provided recruiting inducements to ___________, then prospective football and track prospective student-athlete. The value of the impermissibly financed visits and inducements provided to ___________ totalled $2,700.00."

Read pages 5 and 6. Recruiting inducements and violations by coaches. Paid dinner cruises.. etc.
This post was edited on 9/19/11 at 4:43 pm
Posted by QCC
The Whig
Member since Jul 2010
4972 posts
Posted on 9/19/11 at 4:42 pm to
I guess they've gotten into the business of establishing values for things too. We were "punished" with a minor infraction for having peanut butter and jelly at an athletic conference featuring athletes because the rules say schools can't have condiments. Just bagels.

I 'd. Then 'd
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter