Started By
Message
re: Auburn without Cam Newton
Posted on 9/14/11 at 6:36 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 9/14/11 at 6:36 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
If it was asked why most people start these threads about Fairley, I would have said because he raping your QB's. Guess that doesn't compute though.
There was no scandal about Fairley so no one asked the question. Could you define "huge portion" for me please, by percentage maybe? Just to put his contribution in perspective.
2
Posted on 9/14/11 at 6:38 pm to LSUcc
quote:
Could you define "huge portion" for me please, by percentage maybe? Just to put his contribution in perspective.
Damn that takes too much work. Lets say, led the SEC in rushing, set record for most rushing yards by QB, 20 something passing TD's was it??
Hell, he could have been 100% of our offense, but your argument still doesn't work, there are just too many variables.
Eta: my final point in this crap. You keep saying that because of the scandal you can make the argument, yet you say we did pay him. Therefore, how does the scandal have any bearing on the season? The thread should be then, if Cam was proven to have taken money before te season, how would AU do?
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 7:14 pm
Posted on 9/14/11 at 7:14 pm to LSUcc
quote:
Could you define "huge portion" for me please, by percentage maybe? Just to put his contribution in perspective.
Cam Newton contributed 100% to the National Championship.
But Dyer also contributed 100% to the National Championship.. and Fairley.. and Adams.. and McCaleb.. and Lutzenkirchen.. and Ziemba and EVEN Mosley all contributed 100% to the national championship.
Do I personally think Auburn would have won the National Championship without Cam last year, HECK NO! But if you had asked me 1 week before the start of the 2010 season if Auburn was going to win the National Championship WITH Cam, I would have told you No Way!
It's the same logic, would you have said with Cam Aub would have won the NC last year 1 week before the football season? If you say yes to that, it's the same way as saying "there is no way they win all their games last year without him".
ETA: Both statements are ignorant and retarded. You can't determine anything in "la la land", thank goodness the football season isn't done in "facts and stats" instead of on the field every Saturday.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 7:16 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News