Started By
Message

re: Auburn without Cam Newton

Posted on 9/14/11 at 6:05 pm to
Posted by LSUcc
St. Louis, MO
Member since Feb 2009
2057 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

When you try and bring that he was paid bullshite into the equation, thats not going to fly


I didn't. Audodger asked why everyone only asks this about Cam and not anyone else. I said it a little more bluntly than I probably should have, but the reason is because there was a scandal.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 6:08 pm
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 6:08 pm to
But
Au
Did
Have
Cam
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
35004 posts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

I didn't. Audodger asked why everyone only asks this about Cam and not anyone else. I said it a little more bluntly than I probably should have, but the reason is because there was a scandal.


Well, then you did bring it up. Technically there have been scandals about MI, they just weren't as "big" as how Cam's has been blown up too. It still doesn't give any validity to trying to argue what would happen if we didn't have him. Its great you think we would have been 6-6 without him, but until you can take him off the roster and change our W-L total, the argument is futile.

This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 6:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter