Started By
Message
re: "The Future" 247 Watchlist
Posted on 8/23/11 at 5:21 pm to AMM AU9893
Posted on 8/23/11 at 5:21 pm to AMM AU9893
Mini rant here, but why do all the recruiting sites seems to give almost every WR at least 4 stars?
I mean look, this a breakdown by site:
247 29
Rivals 48
Scout 43
Espn 39
You think they could reduce it a bit for as "good as they are", instead of giving every WR mentionable 4 stars. I know it's a plentiful position in HS, but you still have to do your job to desperate the best from the rest, instead of just giving them all 4*.
Makes me lose faith in the system even more, not that I had a lot left...
I mean look, this a breakdown by site:
247 29
Rivals 48
Scout 43
Espn 39
You think they could reduce it a bit for as "good as they are", instead of giving every WR mentionable 4 stars. I know it's a plentiful position in HS, but you still have to do your job to desperate the best from the rest, instead of just giving them all 4*.
Makes me lose faith in the system even more, not that I had a lot left...
This post was edited on 8/23/11 at 5:24 pm
3
Posted on 8/23/11 at 5:23 pm to MagillaGuerilla
Better question is , What will it take to have a 5 star kicker or Punter?
Posted on 8/23/11 at 5:23 pm to MagillaGuerilla
Good WRs seem easier to come by. 
Posted on 8/23/11 at 5:29 pm to MagillaGuerilla
quote:
Mini rant here, but why do all the recruiting sites seems to give almost every WR at least 4 stars?
There's not much of a way to separate WRs from each other. It's a position so reliant on the QB that the only way to really separate them is just physical attributes. WRs are hit or miss usually.
For example, Emory Blake was a 3* on most sites, while Benton was Terrell Owens Part 2. Blake has showed up Benton the past two years.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News