Started By
Message

re: Sell me on Bama winning the SEC based solely on their defensive front 7....

Posted on 7/28/11 at 10:40 am to
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52808 posts
Posted on 7/28/11 at 10:40 am to
quote:


Bama's secondary was not that good last year.



Good enough to finish as one of the best in the SEC and the nation, statistically. So we were kind of good...
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33950 posts
Posted on 7/28/11 at 11:00 am to
quote:

ood enough to finish as one of the best in the SEC and the nation, statistically. So we were kind of good...





While this is true, they didn't perform up to par in key games (LSU, South Carolina, and Auburn).

Plus, key members of that secondary, namely both corners, were suspect last year against good WRs (Alshon, Rueben, and Zachary).

You had better hope they have improved. I, like Saban, remain skeptical. Experience getting burned isn't the type of experience that necessarily helps.

LSU's secondary, on the other hand, is full of guys who have either proved themselves or have surprised everybody with their play.

So Bama's secondary is mostly hype at this point, while LSU's is underrated.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter