Started By
Message
re: Not looking good for Auburn...
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:50 pm to beatbammer
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:50 pm to beatbammer
quote:
I don't think you've figured out yet that you aren't the one that determines whether a violation is major or not
Agreed... and not trying to argue that point.
Just explaining why it didnt show in my results/list.
2
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:53 pm to UAalumnus
quote:
Agreed... and not trying to argue that point.
Just explaining why it didnt show in my results/list.
So your results list for auburn and bama contained two sets of different criteria. Sounds like bama logic to me. Or by bama math "37" championships
Posted on 7/11/11 at 7:00 pm to UAalumnus
NCAA INFRACTIONS: MAJOR vs. MINOR (Volume XI, Page 116, Section 4)
g) Secondary infractions committed by Auburn administrators, staff, students, boosters, and fans shall be considered in toto as major in nature and counted as such in all message board(s) debates.
h) Secondary infractions committed by Alabama administrators, staff, students, boosters, and fans shall be considered in toto as minor in nature and counted as such in all message board(s) debates.
g) Secondary infractions committed by Auburn administrators, staff, students, boosters, and fans shall be considered in toto as major in nature and counted as such in all message board(s) debates.
h) Secondary infractions committed by Alabama administrators, staff, students, boosters, and fans shall be considered in toto as minor in nature and counted as such in all message board(s) debates.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News