Started By
Message
re: SI: Why Alabama, Not Oklahoma, Should be #1
Posted on 5/25/11 at 11:58 am to Brew Drees
Posted on 5/25/11 at 11:58 am to Brew Drees
You're probably right. I mean, if you think about it, the last time we started a new quarterback that was half as talented as these two it was disastrous.
3
Posted on 5/25/11 at 11:59 am to X
You know college football writers have nothing to do when this comes out
Posted on 5/25/11 at 11:59 am to X
quote:
You're probably right. I mean, if you think about it, the last time we started a new quarterback that was half as talented as these two it was disastrous.
Yes because history is always the best indicator of the future. It's a preseason poll, so right away it's horrible IMO. But if they're going to exist I'm going to pick the team with the superior quarterback, which is OU.
Posted on 5/25/11 at 11:59 am to X
I'm pretty sarcastic myself, so I see what you are saying..but McElroy had more playing experience, he was a RS JUNIOR(yes, i think that extra year was vital in his development)
Just tell me, when was the last time a RS Soph. won a national title in his first year starting?
Just tell me, when was the last time a RS Soph. won a national title in his first year starting?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News