re: Auburn 4 trailer robbery update...

quote:

---

And again, you don't have to get all defensive. I never said anything like "oh noes dyer is fricked!". It was simply speculating on possible scenarios. Sorry you're having a hard time with reading comprehension.

---

Whatever you say, champ.

quote:

---

But I suppose they could just say that they sold them the gun, which would still be a crime since they were minors iirc.

---

Yeah, it's not like you already confirmed he was guilty and starting making shite up out of the blue or anything.

quote:

---

You obviously don't have a clue how the interrogation process works.

---

I know exactly how the interrogation process works. And I know exactly how the legal process works. We aren't talking about murder here. It's a firearm used in a robbery. You actually have to have hard evidence to prove that Dyer, in the first place, knew about any such pre-planned crime. Prove that Dyer was the one to actually give them the gun. Instead, you are basing your guilty assumption on what an unknown poster has said on TigerDroppings. The only thing connecting Dyer to this farce, is that he was dating an girl, that no one knows a damn thing about.

So if a relative of mine, goes out and buys a gun. And that said gun was used to hold up a 7-11 by someone else, then I am automatically implicated in said crime? Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?

I guess not.