Started By
Message
re: Tennessee Coaching Search - Updated list per the athletic dept.
Posted on 3/23/11 at 1:41 pm to Govt Tide
Posted on 3/23/11 at 1:41 pm to Govt Tide
quote:
There aren't enough Pilot Gas Stations on the planet for UT's athletic department's budget to catch up to Bama's.
LOL. Apparently there are more than enough. Bama'll catch up some day.
LINK
3
Posted on 3/23/11 at 2:25 pm to Volmanac
quote:
LOL. Apparently there are more than enough. Bama'll catch up some day.
LINK
I figured Tennessee's was just as high (and apparently higher).
Posted on 3/23/11 at 2:42 pm to Volmanac
quote:
LOL. Apparently there are more than enough. Bama'll catch up some day.
LINK
Nice link.
Expense to Revenue Difference:
UT $-487,618
UA $5,297,584
Way to BOOM yourself, dumbass.
Posted on 3/23/11 at 2:51 pm to Volmanac
According to the site you linked, Bama had profits of over $5M, while Tenn had losses of approx $500k. I looked at overall budget and sorted the Southeastern Conference by expense to revenue difference (in the business worl this is known as "the bottom line"). UT was near bottom of the conference. You LOST money. How does that equal more resources than Bama?
(please say this doesnt account for booster contributions to athletics bc it will kill your argument and save us all the trouble...then try to find a non-ut or non-bama fan to say UT can match Bama in spending. There are rationale fans on both sides, I am just not sure that you are among them at this point)
(please say this doesnt account for booster contributions to athletics bc it will kill your argument and save us all the trouble...then try to find a non-ut or non-bama fan to say UT can match Bama in spending. There are rationale fans on both sides, I am just not sure that you are among them at this point)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News