Started By
Message

re: ScAUbinsky: Past Time for Bond and Bell to put up or shut up

Posted on 2/28/11 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54185 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 1:58 pm to
quote:


yeah I feel you man. We don't know when they heard the tapes though, if they did. My point is just that every single time this case comes up, Auburn fans bring this up, and it's just really not that important, at least not as much as it is made out to be on here. It could be, if they heard the tapes but we don't know.
But that's what this post is about. I try to point to some facts and logic and people then move from the one point being discussed into the larger issue. I was making one small point about Coonass' belief that the reinstatement decision was essentially made only relying on AUs info. Also, I pointed out that either the NCAA did not hear the tapes before the reinstatement decision or the NCAA did not find credible info on the tapes indicating Cam's knowledge.

Or, if you believe Coonass, the NCAA heard the tapes, knew they existed, but ignored them, ruled Cam eligible, said the ruling was based on no evidence of Cam's knowledge and then just crossed their fingers that Bond and Bell would never tell anyone about the tapes.
Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23860 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Or, if you believe Coonass, the NCAA heard the tapes, knew they existed, but ignored them, ruled Cam eligible, said the ruling was based on no evidence of Cam's knowledge and then just crossed their fingers that Bond and Bell would never tell anyone about the tapes.

Why couldn't they have heard the tapes later though. Why does it have to be that they heard before they ruled him eligible? Did I miss that it was supposedly before that?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter