Started By
Message

re: ScAUbinsky: Past Time for Bond and Bell to put up or shut up

Posted on 2/28/11 at 1:47 pm to
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54185 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

The NCAA did suggest that Auburn sit Cam based on preliminary findings, and Auburn chose to ignore this
And then the NCAA changed their mind and said they didn't have any evidence to suggest AU or Cam did anything improper? Use a little logic and reasoning. The NCAA is likely continuing their investigation and may find something, but to believe that they had enough evidence before the reinstatement decision and ignored it, is assanine.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

but to believe that they had enough evidence before the reinstatement decision and ignored it, is assanine.


Yet, knowing there was possibly more out there and ignoring it, they reinstated him. What other players have been reinstated while an investigation continued into their situation?
Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23860 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

And then the NCAA changed their mind and said they didn't have any evidence to suggest AU or Cam did anything improper?

Correct. At that time, with very little information, and a short investigation,they did not have any solid evidence to indicate that Cam should be ineligible. Why are we still talking about that? It does not mean shite.
This post was edited on 2/28/11 at 1:51 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter