Started By
Message

re: Nick Fairley 40 time

Posted on 2/28/11 at 9:59 am to
Posted by CFBFAN1121
Abbottabad, Pakistan
Member since Sep 2006
4174 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Dude you don't know WTF you're talking about


No dude, you're the dumbass that cant comprehend 2 tenths of a second is not that much time.

I bet you also think someone who runs a 4.49 is significantly faster than someone who runs a 4.51.

You're talking to someone who has spent plenty of time act camps timing kids in the 40 yard dash.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 10:07 am to
Posted by md9897
Birmingham
Member since Dec 2010
410 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 10:10 am to
quote:

No dude, you're the dumbass that cant comprehend 2 tenths of a second is not that much time.

I bet you also think someone who runs a 4.49 is significantly faster than someone who runs a 4.51.

You're talking to someone who has spent plenty of time act camps timing kids in the 40 yard dash.


Someone who won't let it go...look, you've already been proven wrong a few posts back, and we all know it's not a constant speed so it's definitely not "Fairley lost to Ingram by One Step", even though Fairley is mighty quick for his size.

Just let it go man...
This post was edited on 2/28/11 at 10:12 am
Posted by m1q32
Member since Feb 2010
144 posts
Posted on 2/28/11 at 10:10 am to
quote:

I bet you also think someone who runs a 4.49 is significantly faster than someone who runs a 4.51.



That's 2 hundreths not 2 tenths.

And the difference in this particular case of 2 hundreths difference would be 0.177 yards or about 0.53 feet.
This post was edited on 2/28/11 at 10:14 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter