Started By
Message
re: Safety in the Sugar Bowl
Posted on 1/5/11 at 10:18 am to Aubie83
Posted on 1/5/11 at 10:18 am to Aubie83
It was a safety by the rule but I thought the officials should have called forward progress and stopped the play. Id say 90% of the time in the same situation the officials would have marked it at the 2 or 3.
2
Posted on 1/5/11 at 10:23 am to bomber77
If you look at the other official (not the one discussing with the head ref), he is marking it around the 2 just in case.
I thought there were several pass interference non-calls on both sides.
One play that stands out is when OSU had the ball 3rd and 10 in the 4th. The RE for Arky sprints across the line, the LE flinches, the OSU RT jumps early. They call false start. I thought that should have been offsides. 3rd and 15 is wayyyyy different than 3rd and 5.
I thought there were several pass interference non-calls on both sides.
One play that stands out is when OSU had the ball 3rd and 10 in the 4th. The RE for Arky sprints across the line, the LE flinches, the OSU RT jumps early. They call false start. I thought that should have been offsides. 3rd and 15 is wayyyyy different than 3rd and 5.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 10:28 am to bomber77
quote:
I thought the officials should have called forward progress and stopped the play
they would have if he wouldn't have broken the tackle in the endzone and tried to gain forward progress again. how could you not see that?
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News