Started By
Message

re: Safety in the Sugar Bowl

Posted on 1/5/11 at 10:12 am to
Posted by MattP598
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
1920 posts
Posted on 1/5/11 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Should have not been a safety. Same exact thing happened in the Auburn-LSU game and it wasn't called. I wonder why


Well you just said it shouldn't of been called. Maybe that's why?
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52809 posts
Posted on 1/5/11 at 10:17 am to
I thought it was clearly a safety. So does forward progress carry over to when the rb breaks completely free from the defenders and starts to run again? That's fricking stupid. It's simple, if he had have went down when he first started getting tackled it wouldn't have been a safety, but he broke free and got tackled in the end zone, therefore, its an obvious safety.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter