Started By
Message
re: When Bama's best two players received improper benefits
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:11 pm to BamaChick
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:11 pm to BamaChick
quote:
They were ruled ineligible.
The NCAA reinstated them.
Isnt that exactly what happened in AU's case?
But you guys have been screaming that he violated SEC by law so anything less than ruling Cam ineligible is a travesty.
4
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:13 pm to LSU8932
quote:
What a dumb post. A damn fishing trip with a friend doth not equate to a player and his father pimping themselves for CARS and MONEY.
Where? PLEASE I will give you a million dollars if you show me proof Cam got benefits! Just because you post this shite OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER does not make it true.
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:13 pm to LSU8932
quote:
They were ruled ineligible.
The NCAA reinstated them.
Isnt that exactly what happened in AU's case?
But you guys have been screaming that he violated SEC by law so anything less than ruling Cam ineligible is a travesty.
BOOM! 
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:13 pm to LSU8932
quote:
Isnt that exactly what happened in AU's case?
Not exactly.
Mark and Julio played in ZERO games while their eligibility was in question. The NCAA reinstated them prior to the season.
The NCAA stated that the investigation was done in the fishing trip incident and that was that.
Nowhere has the NCAA stated that they were done investigating the Cam Newton matter and he played in 12 games.
This post was edited on 12/3/10 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:15 pm to LSU8932
and let's not forget Jerrell Harris and his laptop.... yet again, a TANGIBLE benefit.... you know, where something of value is given away.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News