Started By
Message

re: When Bama's best two players received improper benefits

Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:08 pm to
Posted by auburnu008
I am the bagman
Member since Feb 2010
18529 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

There's a difference, Ingram and Julio were suspended and paid back the money. That same guy also gave Jerrell Harris a free laptop and when Saban found out about this he sat Harris for pretty much the entire year.


So they actually got benefits, but Auburn has given zero benefits to Cam Newton? If you say they have, please show my proof where Auburn, boosters, staff, coaches, etc has given Cam anything. Show me where Auburn is being investigated.
Posted by BamaChick
Terminus
Member since Dec 2008
21393 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

Show me where Auburn is being investigated.


quote:

Reinstatement decisions are independent of the NCAA enforcement process and typically are made once the facts of the student-athlete’s involvement are determined. The reinstatement process is likely to conclude prior to the close of an investigation. It is NCAA policy not to comment on current, pending or potential investigations
.

Show me where it says AU isn't being investigated.

Sounds like the NCAA left its options open in that regard.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90739 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

So they actually got benefits, but Auburn has given zero benefits to Cam Newton?


You don't know this.
Posted by cyde
He gone
Member since Nov 2005
31793 posts
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

So they actually got benefits

Did you miss the part where they got suspended, paid the "benefits" back to charity and got reinstated by the NCAA?

(I'm guessing that was the part you intentionally skipped)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter