Started By
Message
re: When Bama's best two players received improper benefits
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:07 pm to CFBFAN1121
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:07 pm to CFBFAN1121
They were ruled ineligible.
The NCAA reinstated them.
They paid the equivalent money to charity.
The guy that took them on the fishing trip was an AU booster and fan.
If you think shopping a recruit for hundreds of thousands of dollars to secure his signature = a one day fishing trip then you are even dumber than I thought.
The NCAA reinstated them.
They paid the equivalent money to charity.
The guy that took them on the fishing trip was an AU booster and fan.
If you think shopping a recruit for hundreds of thousands of dollars to secure his signature = a one day fishing trip then you are even dumber than I thought.
This post was edited on 12/3/10 at 6:08 pm
1
Posted on 12/3/10 at 6:11 pm to BamaChick
quote:
They were ruled ineligible.
The NCAA reinstated them.
Isnt that exactly what happened in AU's case?
But you guys have been screaming that he violated SEC by law so anything less than ruling Cam ineligible is a travesty.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News