Started By
Message
re: This is no longer about Auburn, it is about the next university...
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:20 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:20 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
Now, if the NCAA rep had said, "In determining how a violation impacts a student-athlete's eligibility, we must consider ONLY the young person's responsibility AND NO OTHER FACTORS" then your argument would be vaild.
If other factors mattered, he would have mentioned them. He mentioned nothing about astrology, penis length of the player or the amount of rainfall in the student-athlete's hometown but I doubt they factor in to the discussion. You see, with your idiotic open-ended argument, EVERY FACTOR IN THE WORLD COULD BE BROUGHT IN TO THE EVALUATION. The price of brie in Paris, the cost of a hooker in Thailand. Yours is a silly argument.
I'll stick to what the NCAA plainly says, thank you very much.
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 10:28 pm
1
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:23 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
However, the threat of major sanctions against the program should keep this from mushrooming on that side of the equation because nothing in the ruling today changes that
Before today, we always assume that if a player's dad asked for money, whether or not the player knew, the player would be found to be ineligible.
Before today, we always thought that if a player's dad was paid by a booster, whether or no the player knew, the player would be found ineligible.
Based on what Kevin Lennon said today, both of those assumptions were wrong. It is all about the player's responsibility. Did he know? If not, no consequences for him. That is why this is so scary.....the floodgates have opened. Reread Lennon's statement.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News