Started By
Message
re: This is no longer about Auburn, it is about the next university...
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:15 pm to FearlessFreep
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:15 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
Let's hypothesize that the NCAA eventually uncovers clear evidence of a money trail from AU to Cecil. Is it your contention that, absent any proof that Cam was aware of the transaction, that his eligibility for games that took place after the money changed hands would remain unaffected?
I'm not hypothesizing anything......based on what the NCAA VP who ruled on the matter said, it is all about the degree of responsibility of the student-athlete. If we find out tomorrow that Cam's dad was paid ten million bucks, and Cam didn't know, Cam's responsibility is still zero, per Kevin Lennon.
1
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:20 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
Now, if the NCAA rep had said, "In determining how a violation impacts a student-athlete's eligibility, we must consider ONLY the young person's responsibility AND NO OTHER FACTORS" then your argument would be vaild.
If other factors mattered, he would have mentioned them. He mentioned nothing about astrology, penis length of the player or the amount of rainfall in the student-athlete's hometown but I doubt they factor in to the discussion. You see, with your idiotic open-ended argument, EVERY FACTOR IN THE WORLD COULD BE BROUGHT IN TO THE EVALUATION. The price of brie in Paris, the cost of a hooker in Thailand. Yours is a silly argument.
I'll stick to what the NCAA plainly says, thank you very much.
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 10:28 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News