Started By
Message
re: This is no longer about Auburn, it is about the next university...
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:11 pm to FearlessFreep
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:11 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
How about you post a link where the NCAA says that player responsibility is the ONLY consideration, no matter what the nature of the violation.
I already did.
quote:
Your interpretation of the NCAA's statement is totally without merit.
I didn't 'interpret' anything. The NCAA VP who ruled on the matter said:
quote:
"In determining how a violation impacts a student-athlete's eligibility, we must consider the young person's responsibility. "
He didn't mention solicitation or any specific offense, he was speaking generally about any violation.
Auburn could have given Cecil $10,000,000 and a house and could have hired a hitman on his behalf to kill a personal enemy of his and if Cam didn't know, his degree of responsibility is zero.
I know this makes you nervous. It makes all of us nervous. None of us ever thought it would be like this in college football.....but it is......thanks to Cecil and the NCAA.
1
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:14 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:
In determining how a violation impacts a student-athlete's eligibility, we must consider the young person's responsibility. "
Do you know what the word underlined in the sentence above means?
It appears that you don't.
Now, if the NCAA rep had said, "In determining how a violation impacts a student-athlete's eligibility, we must consider ONLY the young person's responsibility AND NO OTHER FACTORS" then your argument would be vaild.
He didn't. It isn't.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News