Started By
Message
re: This is no longer about Auburn, it is about the next university...
Posted on 12/1/10 at 9:56 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
Posted on 12/1/10 at 9:56 pm to Dr Drunkenstein
quote:OK, so taking that as gospel truth, Cam wouldn't have been in any trouble, but you can bet your arse that the school(s) and any boosters associated with the payments would be.
It fact, it appears that even if MSU or Auburn had paid Cecil, Cam would have been in absolutely no trouble at all. Why do I say this? Because this is what the NCAA said today.
That was my initial point, even if it doesn't impact the player's eligibility, it still is a violation on the part of the institution if money changes hands and that is where the schools would be playing with fire.
2
Posted on 12/1/10 at 10:02 pm to PJinAtl
quote:
PJinAtl
Yeah, but what do the players and their families care about that shite? If they got their money, it doesn't matter to them if the school never competes again.
Besides, if their kid is that big a stud athlete, he'll probably be pulling down even more money in the NFL, right?
If I were an Auburn fan, I would spend every night praying for lightning to strike that fricking "church" of Cecil's and for it to burn down to the ground... though, he'd probably just fill out an insurance claim for a bunch of shite that was never there to begin with.
That guy is a serious lowlife.
This post was edited on 12/1/10 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 12/2/10 at 12:10 am to PJinAtl
quote:
That was my initial point, even if it doesn't impact the player's eligibility, it still is a violation on the part of the institution if money changes hands and that is where the schools would be playing with fire.
So be smart about it. the person that pays can in no way be tied to the university.
Maybe even a booster who the university has already cut ties with.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News