Started By
Message

re: If Auburn Was Innocent.....

Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:25 am to
Posted by GoldenSombrero
Member since Sep 2010
2651 posts
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:25 am to
No I'm being serious. Maybe I didn't make myself clear.

We can all agree Cecil trying to solicit money from MSU makes Cam ineligible? Right. If you can't see that then don't read any further.

Auburn, from various sources other than TD, was told by the NCAA that they urge them to sit Cam. Based solely on Cecil admitting to the reports of asking for money Cam would be ineligible, regardless of what AU did or did not do.

Therefore, IF Auburn was merely an innocent bystander and knew nothing of Cecil asking for money, they would sit him to risk further penalties. They would have to vacate wins, but their program wouldn't be punished long term.

They know the hammer is coming down hard and just hope it doesn't before the MNC.
Posted by Hog Springs
I'm on a boat
Member since Nov 2010
4436 posts
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:28 am to
Dude, this makes NO sense.

"We're innocent, so let's sit our best player."
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82061 posts
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:36 am to
quote:

We can all agree Cecil trying to solicit money from MSU makes Cam ineligible? Right


if you believe Kenny then yes.
This post was edited on 11/17/10 at 8:36 am
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
51849 posts
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Auburn, from various sources other than TD, was told by the NCAA that they urge them to sit Cam.


Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36141 posts
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:37 am to
quote:


We can all agree Cecil trying to solicit money from MSU makes Cam ineligible? Right. If you can't see that then don't read any further.



Most of us think that - but they are screwed anyway if it's true

If the Auburn administration or boosters intimately associated with the program have their hands dirty they are screwed anyway.

If they are not involved or they have plausible deniability then they are going to play him because nothing worse than lost wins is likely

The only thing that would make them sit him at this point would be an expectation of more severe NCAA sanctions for doing so... and I don't know enough to say if that's a plausible issue
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter