Started By
Message
If Auburn Was Innocent.....
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:04 am
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:04 am
....they would SIT Cam. Think about it. Everyone saying they are playing him because they have nothing to hide/ did nothing wrong is way off base. Think about it, they KNOW what Ceil did will eventually make Cam ineligible. And, if they had nothing to hide they would sit him, vacate 10 wins and move on.
But instead they have decided to ride this thing into the ground which shows me they have many skeltons in the closet that are being uncovered.
Enjoy these last few days Auburn
But instead they have decided to ride this thing into the ground which shows me they have many skeltons in the closet that are being uncovered.
Enjoy these last few days Auburn
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:06 am to GoldenSombrero
No way whats so ever do I sit Newton at 10-0 and ranked number 2 in the BCS. What if the NCAA and teh SEC never find anything. you gave up 2 games for Rumors on Tiger Droppings.
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:07 am to GoldenSombrero
quote:
And, if they had nothing to hide they would sit him, vacate 10 wins and move on.
Doesn't make sense. If hypothetically nothing at all happened against NCAA rules why on Earth would they sit him? I think regardless of the situation you play him, at this point when the NCAA finds his dad guilty then we have to vacate the first 10 wins.
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:08 am to GoldenSombrero
quote:
If Auburn Was Innocent...they would SIT Cam.
Nah the OP is joking. You're joking, right?
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:11 am to GoldenSombrero
quote:
Enjoy these last few days Auburn
I swear, people assume its the end of the world for Auburn Athletics...
This post was edited on 11/17/10 at 8:11 am
Posted on 11/17/10 at 8:19 am to GoldenSombrero
quote:
If Auburn Was Innocent.........they would SIT Cam.
I stopped reading there.
Posted on 11/17/10 at 9:23 am to GoldenSombrero
quote:
If Auburn Was Innocent.....
....they would SIT Cam.
I was saying this before the UGA game. Playing him was a de facto admission by Auburn that they were neck deep (or deeper) and had nothing to gain by sitting him. Therefore they have nothing to lose by playing him. Therefore, they are, in culinary terms, well done.
I wonder what wine goes with well done wareagleplainsmantiger?
This post was edited on 11/17/10 at 9:24 am
Posted on 11/17/10 at 9:24 am to GoldenSombrero
Don't ever, ever go into a profession that requires logical thinking or sharp analytical skills. Ever.
Posted on 11/17/10 at 11:04 am to GoldenSombrero
quote:
Think about it, they KNOW what Ceil did will eventually make Cam ineligible.
Yes, Auburn, the NCAA know what Cecil did and I am beginning to think that there specific statement in the NCAA rules that covers what Cecil did. It states unethical conduct by the athlete or institutional staff members but makes not mention of a representative of the athlete including family members.
==================================================
10.1 Unethical Conduct
Unethical conduct by a prospective or enrolled student-athlete or a current or former institutional staff member (e.g., coach, professor, tutor, teaching assistant, student manager, student trainer) may include, but is not limitedto, the following:
(c) Knowing involvement in offering or providing a prospective or an enrolled student-athlete an improper inducement or extra benefit or improper financial aid;
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News