Started By
Message
What would be the best case scenario for the SEC?
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:46 am
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:46 am
I say from a money stand point it would be adding Texas, Texas A&M, North Carolina, and Virginia Tech. It would expand the SEc to some huge media markets. I know this buy will most likely never happen though.
9
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:47 am to am4titansandlsu
That would be too expensive.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:47 am to am4titansandlsu
I don't want Texas at all
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:48 am to ole orange
quote:
I don't want Texas at all
Get ready, because I do believe (and I am always right) the SEC will get Texas and A&M.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:50 am to am4titansandlsu
I think we should stay just as we are because it works. Weve won more national championships than any other conference and our conference is undefeated in the MNCG. We make plenty of money for our schools. Ill be convinced when a conference actually does dethrone us as the best, rather than scream "expanded" because Kirk Herbstreit says the Pac 16 will now be the best there is.
So let everyone else do what they wanna do because there are still plenty of quality schools out there besides all the ones involved in all this expansion talk. Let the other conference be the guinee pigs and if it works and our elite status begins to be questions on the field, then we go and act!
So let everyone else do what they wanna do because there are still plenty of quality schools out there besides all the ones involved in all this expansion talk. Let the other conference be the guinee pigs and if it works and our elite status begins to be questions on the field, then we go and act!
This post was edited on 6/10/10 at 11:51 am
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:51 am to JoLeUGA
Picking up Texas, A&M, both Okies delivers all of Texas and Oklahoma. Who do you think fans of those states want to watch on Saturday? West Coast teams or SEC?
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:52 am to am4titansandlsu
why do we have to change? We have the best product on the field. Everyone else is changing to catch us. I say we wait and se what happens. All they have lost so far is CU and Neb so the big 12 still has ten teams, what if they pick up TCU and someone else?
Posted on 6/10/10 at 11:59 am to labamafan
if we get tejas the league office will be relocating to big d.
it might be somewhat enjoyable
it might be somewhat enjoyable
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:06 pm to am4titansandlsu
quote:
I say from a money stand point it would be adding Texas, Texas A&M, North Carolina, and Virginia Tech.
Best of all possible worlds. Highly unlikely to happen. I see VT as the only possible reality among that group unless the Texas-Taggs west coast thing falls apart.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:08 pm to am4titansandlsu
I don't want Texas or Oklahoma in the SEC. I'd be ok with Texas A&M.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:10 pm to EST
quote:
I don't want Texas or Oklahoma in the SEC. I'd be ok with Texas A&M.
OU fits better than both TX and A&M
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:12 pm to cyogi
They don't even want to join the SEC. They are going to follow (or lead) the mass exodus from the Big 12 to the Pac 10. Its virtually a done deal.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:12 pm to EST
i say you package ou and a&m, texas doesn't want to be here. they can't be king. thus the two b.c.s. spots for the pac 10. they want virtually a garantee w/o playing a championship game.
then decide between miami, v tech, f.s.u., and north carolina or ga tech.
then decide between miami, v tech, f.s.u., and north carolina or ga tech.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:21 pm to dos crystal
Sec West:
LSU
Miss St
Ole Piss
Arkansas
Texas
A&M
Oklahoma
Okie St
SEC East:
Auburn
Alabama
Florida
Vandy
Tennessee
Kentucky
Georgia
South Carolina
Why not?
LSU
Miss St
Ole Piss
Arkansas
Texas
A&M
Oklahoma
Okie St
SEC East:
Auburn
Alabama
Florida
Vandy
Tennessee
Kentucky
Georgia
South Carolina
Why not?
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:22 pm to dos crystal
The problem is Texas will not go anywhere without Texas A&M.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:23 pm to Haughton99
They East would be friggin sick, hell the whole conference is nasty.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:25 pm to am4titansandlsu
I question if adding some teams actually will earn the conference more money.
We alreay have too many douche bags in Tuscaloosa. We don't need Longhorn fans too.
We alreay have too many douche bags in Tuscaloosa. We don't need Longhorn fans too.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:28 pm to Colonel Flagg
The texas, miami, virginia, and n.c. markets will increase revenue from t.v.
you get one of the texas schools and ou, you have the houston and dallas market wrapped up. 2 of the top five markets.
you get one of the texas schools and ou, you have the houston and dallas market wrapped up. 2 of the top five markets.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 12:31 pm to am4titansandlsu
Best case scenario would be to add Texas, Oklahoma, Texas A&M and FSU. It will never happen.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 1:23 pm to tiger perry
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best case scenario would be to add Texas, Oklahoma, Texas A&M and FSU. It will never happen.
This is correct, both for the sake of competition and TV markets.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News