Started By
Message
re: College Football Live talking about conference expansion
Posted on 5/7/10 at 7:51 pm to NIH
Posted on 5/7/10 at 7:51 pm to NIH
Yes, it's not hard to see that more money would most likely come from conference expansion. My argument was not only that Texas and aTm would bring in more than Clemson and FSU but vastly more. Many didn't seem to realize this, or the benefits that would come along with it. It seemed as though most people were complaining about the distance, or the extinguishing of old rivalries. I can tell you being in one of the more remote parts of the SEC, long distance travel is just long distance travel after a point. And the SEC could set up a structure where all rivalries are maintained, while adding new and exciting ones as well.
You're getting there my amateur friend.
quote:
i'm a ''thinker'' too, the sky is blue
You're getting there my amateur friend.
This post was edited on 5/7/10 at 7:52 pm
Posted on 5/7/10 at 7:54 pm to DemGaters
More money would not matter that much considering expansion would lower the number of OOC games we play and those would be cupcakes most likely. In the end, our conference would turn into a watered down version of what it used to be...with long standing rivalries, where every game mattered, where you could drive to every campus in the SEC in reasonable time, etc.
Posted on 5/7/10 at 7:54 pm to DemGaters
quote:
You're getting there my amateur friend
shut the frick up noob.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News