Started By
Message
re: James Stone?
Posted on 2/3/10 at 9:29 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
Posted on 2/3/10 at 9:29 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
I don't see why you are going fishing. What was said was true. After Kiffin left and Dooley was hired, Stone had a renewed interest in the school that he had followed all of his life. Saban compensated by renewing his interest in Shon Coleman. We ended up not getting either of them. Such is the way of recruiting. You win some and you lose some. This is still a Top 5 recruiting class and I'm really happy with it.
2
Posted on 2/3/10 at 9:31 am to RollTide1987
quote:
What was said was true.
Not all of you
Posted on 2/3/10 at 9:33 am to RollTide1987
The point was that quite a few UA posters on here took the stance that Shon Coleman was UA's if they wanted him. It was simply a matter of whether or not you got Stone. If Stone went to UA, then Saban would "let us have" Coleman. However, if Stone went to UT, then unfortunately Lord Saban would have to take SC from AU.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News