Started By
Message
re: More quality in this Arkansas class than any before
Posted on 2/1/10 at 9:59 am to JoeJuice
Posted on 2/1/10 at 9:59 am to JoeJuice
I'm not naive to the lack of high-end talent.
What the SEC doesn't see though is that Arkansas used to sign a few 4 stars, maybe a 5 star, then load up on 2 star diamonds in the rough or very low rated 3 stars.
By the numbers, this class has the highest quality players, from top to bottom, that we have signed since player ratings were developed.
What the SEC doesn't see though is that Arkansas used to sign a few 4 stars, maybe a 5 star, then load up on 2 star diamonds in the rough or very low rated 3 stars.
By the numbers, this class has the highest quality players, from top to bottom, that we have signed since player ratings were developed.
This post was edited on 2/1/10 at 10:00 am
Posted on 2/1/10 at 10:01 am to woopiginaustin
quote:
then load up on 2 star diamonds in the rough
FIFY
Posted on 2/1/10 at 10:03 am to woopiginaustin
another thing is that rivals ranks a 5.5 as the same as 5.7 in team rankings
Posted on 2/1/10 at 10:05 am to woopiginaustin
I would have to disagree. Last year we singed only 1-2star recruit per rivals. 21-3stars, 8-4stars and 1-5star. That was the best class top-to-bottom, on paper, we have ever had.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)