Started By
Message
locked post

More quality in this Arkansas class than any before

Posted on 2/1/10 at 9:40 am
Posted by woopiginaustin
Moderator
Member since Jun 2008
8590 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 9:40 am
% of Arkansas recruits with 5.6 or higher rating from Rivals:
2010 - 84% (16/19)-Petrino
2009 - 77% (24/31)-Petrino
2008 - 38% (10/26)-Some sort of Nutt/Petrino combo
2007 - 48% (13/27)
2006 - 32% (7/22)
2005 - 39% (9/23)
2004 - 32% (8/25)




The average star ranking for this class is a 3.0, much higher than over 14 teams listed ahead of Arkansas due to volume of signees. The class was always going to be small and aimed at providing depth, with kids being told to expect to redshirt.

A 5.6 Rivals rating is basically a middle of the pack recruit and anything below that is below average. Right now we have 16 out of our 20 rated players at 5.6 or higher. So, 84% of this class is considered to be above average. To put that in perspective last year (considered by many as our best class ever) we had 77% at a 5.6 or higher rating.

A 5.8 rating is a 4* player. Arkansas has signed eight 5.7 ratings. So, eight players are 0.1 from a fourth star, for what that's worth.

The main difference this year compared to all the other years is that we don't have the 4* and 5* superstar names at the top of the list that greatly exaggerate the Rivals team rankings. Instead Petrino is just putting together another top to bottom solid class and adding depth that has been neglected in years past as shown in these numbers.




This post was edited on 2/1/10 at 10:09 am
Posted by righty1975
Member since Jul 2009
66 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 9:47 am to
Uh, ok.
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
132756 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 9:54 am to
wow u finally made a non shitty thread.very good points
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68647 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 10:09 am to
Is this the standard response for Ark homers everywhere? I've seen this posted on like 3 different boards all by different folks. Is this the common defensive mechanism to defend the class of suck?
Posted by Choctaw Hog
Member since Nov 2006
7586 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 10:10 am to
WooPig, good information but you are wasting your time. All the message board experts on here know that the Hogs' class "sucks" this year so let them keep believing our class has no talent.

What's going to be fun is when the Hogs start beating these higher recruiting ranked teams on a regular basis, beginning next year. They will be perplexed because the recruiting experts said that's not possible.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 11:05 am to
Not reading the thread, but you are still behind Vandy.

Great job.
Posted by RMFTBama
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2009
5285 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

A 5.6 Rivals rating is basically a middle of the pack recruit and anything below that is below average. Right now we have 16 out of our 20 rated players at 5.6 or higher. So, 84% of this class is considered to be at or above average. To put that in perspective last year (considered by many as our best class ever) we had 77% at a 5.6 or higher rating.



fify
Posted by trinco
ft smith,arkansas
Member since Nov 2007
63 posts
Posted on 2/1/10 at 9:28 pm to
Great Post! It never fails to amaze me when idiots talk all the Shite about 4star-5star etc... and we kick the shite out of Auburn this year, beat LSU 3 of last 3 basically, lost to florida this year 23-20 before REFS were suspended! Proofs in the Puddin.... The difference in a 3star -4star in so many cases is simply exposure of the kid not a variance in talent.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter