Started By
Message
re: Eric Berry shouldn't be 1st Team All-SEC
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:41 pm to Cdawg
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:41 pm to Cdawg
quote:
Actual on-field play doesn't count, only his overall total numbers do.
I hope you're kidding. Why would people vote for Mallett, when the only times he's been on regional or national television, and was visible to voters, he struggles pretty bad?
quote:
Still doesn't matter, Mallett has better numbers.
So, purely putting up numbers, where the majority came against bad teams, is more important than winning and doing it consistently. Again, Tebow might not have ungodly number, but I think I might want a warrior leading a final drive for a title for me. I think that's what defines a all-conference QB.
2
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:44 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
I hope you're kidding.
I was hoping you could detect the laid on thick sarcasm.
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:48 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
So, purely putting up numbers, where the majority came against bad teams, is more important than winning and doing it consistently
Once again, the W/L record is a Team Stat. If Florida had no defense, they'ed lose each game 30-56...Florida's D is Top 5 = Florida's D gets ball back to Tebow more often than Arkansas' D does for Mallett , yet Mallett has the better numbers...?
You talk about Mallett and his numbers coming against cupcakes...? lol 7 of Tebows TDs have come from cupcakes (32% of his TDs, are from 2 games, and one coming up this weekend)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News