Started By
Message
re: Eric Berry shouldn't be 1st Team All-SEC
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:35 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:35 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Mallett has struggled against every good defense he's faced. If there's consistent pressure, he completes well below 50%
Actual on-field play doesn't count, only his overall total numbers do.
quote:
Tebow doesn't have huge numbers, but he hasn't struggled against great defenses.
Still doesn't matter, Mallett has better numbers.
2
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:38 pm to Cdawg
What I have gathered from this thread:
-When Mallett has a bad game/bad numbers, it is his fault.
-When Tebow has mulitple bad games, the team sucks.
-Team stats (W/L record, total defense, etc) are only attributable to one person, the QB. God forbid Florida's defense save them in a game or two....
-When Mallett has a bad game/bad numbers, it is his fault.
-When Tebow has mulitple bad games, the team sucks.
-Team stats (W/L record, total defense, etc) are only attributable to one person, the QB. God forbid Florida's defense save them in a game or two....
Posted on 11/20/09 at 1:41 pm to Cdawg
quote:
Actual on-field play doesn't count, only his overall total numbers do.
I hope you're kidding. Why would people vote for Mallett, when the only times he's been on regional or national television, and was visible to voters, he struggles pretty bad?
quote:
Still doesn't matter, Mallett has better numbers.
So, purely putting up numbers, where the majority came against bad teams, is more important than winning and doing it consistently. Again, Tebow might not have ungodly number, but I think I might want a warrior leading a final drive for a title for me. I think that's what defines a all-conference QB.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News