Started By
Message

re: Barkley named USC Starter, so where does that leave Mustain?

Posted on 8/28/09 at 3:20 pm to
Posted by King
Deep in the backwoods
Member since Sep 2008
18426 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

This is my whole point. People think he demanded playing time, when in fact he was hoping (and publicly stated) that he wanted to redshirt.


I am not trying to stir shite bro, but what are your sources and where did you get your info?
Posted by SwineFlu
Member since Jul 2009
1059 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 3:27 pm to
quote:


I am not trying to stir shite bro, but what are your sources and where did you get your info?


The Democrat-Gazette.

He was quoted that he wanted to redshirt. There were articles with Nutt saying that Mitch wanted it and they were going to try to do just that, etc.
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65974 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 3:29 pm to

There is nothing that has been said or that will ever be said that hos not been said 1,000 times about this situation. It's pointless.

In the end, Mitch could not hold up HIS end of the bargain relative to showing just how good he is and can be. He "allowed" a kid with one week of USC experience to pass him on the DC back in the spring. One week. The writing was on the wall then...contrary to whatever writers wanted us to believe then, and now.

He's done. Nutt is gone. Beck/Hogwatch is quiet.

Time for this shite to end so we can FINALLY enjoy what is going on in front of our eyes. LA and Oxford should not be on our radar screen.

IMO...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter